Now the charge sheet has been issued to Ms Durga
Shakti Nagapal for her alleged misconduct, and she has already replied on the
charged. This charge sheet can come in public domain in some days; Further High
court of Allahabad has rejected PIL of Ms Nutan Thakur to set aside the
suspension order. Now Supreme Court has also rejected the petition filed by advocate M L
Sharma, who had sought quashing of all the proceedings against Nagpal for
allegedly demolishing of wall of a mosque.
The bench headed by Justice H L Dattu
dismissed the plea and said that it may entertain the petition if she (Nagpal)
herself approaches the court. The bench further said that the officer can take
care of herself and can also approach the other authorities including a court,
against her suspension order.
In the both cases court has said that She (Durga) can
approach the court and court can entertain the plea of her. But Still I believe
that if Ms Durga Shakti Nagapal approach the court this juncture court will not
accept her plea and rather will asked before approaching the court whether all
option available to her for review appeal were exhausted ? If she approaches
the court as on date she will be doing misconduct. I think she understands that
as well and applying her mind correctly.
But why so many legal luminaries knowing fully it trying to
score the point and why they are not filing PIL in general to correct the law
rather than specific case. Before
answering it let us
understand the following in case of domestic inquiry
What is charge
sheet?
Any disciplinary proceedings start with an
allegation of some misconduct against the employee. Whether
something/anything/nothing further will happen or not will obviously depend on
first, the relevance and importance of the evidence and second on situation. If
this is decided that means action stage as initiated and charge sheet is
prepared which describe the article of charges and imputation of charges. The
charge sheet itself decides the tone and tenure of action.
Why the charge
Sheet issued?
In case of departmental inquiry charge sheet is
issued it generally means that sufficient prima facie case has been built
against the employee. Practically speaking the departmental enquiry is only
initiated when the employer has made up his mind that a certain action has to
be taken against a employee and these proceedings are carried out to fulfill
the procedural requirement and employer try to prove that the principal of
natural justice has been followed.
What is the
difference between Domestic inquiry and criminal/Civil Investigation?
The Disciplinary proceedings are quasi judicial
process by which the employer enquires into the allegation of misconduct on the
part of employee. Criminal investigation does not fall in the domain of employer.
Let us understand the criminal and civil offences as well. The criminal offence
may have some motive while civil offences are with some consideration or may be
misconduct. In disciplinary proceedings involving moral turpitude a
departmental enquiry/action is generally necessary while misconduct not
involving moral turpitude a disciplinary action may be avoided. In departmental
inquiry it is not the concern of employer whether the facts established
disclose the commission of criminal offence. The proceedings are neither
criminal nor quasi criminal in nature. The nature of proceedings appears to be
taken to civil proceedings. The materials of evidence in two proceedings
departmental and criminal investigation are relevant in one and tabooed in
other. An incriminating statement made by accused in criminal trail can be
totally inadmissible in departmental inquiry or vice versa. The degree of proof
which is necessary in an order of conviction is different from the degree of
proof which is necessary to record the commission of delinquency. The domestic
inquiry is not bound by the Rules of Evidence and probably it is ignorant of
that. Article 20(2) of the constitution provides that a man cannot be punished
for the same offence more than once. Relying upon this it is also contended
that if the person is under criminal trial /convicted by criminal court then no
action should be taken against him during departmental enquiry.
Service Conditions
The employee
–employer relation is law of master and servant and it is a law of contract and
in this contract one of the parties has the power to adjudicate on the action
of the other party. In this process complaint many times originate from
employer (master) and enquiry is also conducted by the employer. In such case
the principle of natural justice does not hold good here because the prosecutor
is judge for his own cause. The Tribunal and Courts have the power to review
the decision of employer if employee suffers from malafide victimization or
where principle of natural justice is not applied
Courts view
India before globalization, the tendency of courts were pro employee but
after globalization of 1991 at after changes in labour laws ,Tribunals and courts have not
shown any positive response in service matter. In case of servicer rules and
disciplinary matters, courts only comment on procedural law and not on
substantive law. If procedure law is followed by employer courts rarely
comments. Now in case of Durga Shakti Nagpal departmental inquiry has been started
Commissioner has been appointed as Inquiry Authority. The commissioner will
inquire into the article and imputation of the charges, She will be given full
opportunity to demolish the article of charges, argument counter-argument shall
be recorded and each party shall be asked to submit their written statement.
Based on record on inquiry and written statements, witness and relevant documents,
Commissioner will submit his report with proving, not proving and partially
proving the article of charges. On the basis of report of commissioner, the
employer Chief Secretary/Principal Secretary/ will decide the fate of Durga
Shakti Nagpal . It is hoped that Commissioner will reports the facts without
any external and internal pressure and will be unbiased in his report. All the procedures
will be followed in this case as it has media attention. If the report is in
favour of Durga can be accepted or rejected by Disciplinary authority. If,
Durga is given punishment, after due process of law will court question it on
the basis of substantive law?
The rules of
suspension are very painful, one hand the all the service rules do not term the
suspension as punishment and there no definite time frame wherein charge sheet
can be filed against the suspended employee after suspension. The charge sheet
can be filed/issued to officer may be after one year, two years etc. Even the
courts have not come out in this matter with clarity. It only says reasonable
time and reasonable time is highly subjective.
As such people,
lawyer and activist who are filing PIL on behalf of Ms Durga Shakti should file
PIL to bring change in service matter conduct discipline and appeal. The
service rules should be in accordance to article 14 to 32 of the constitution.
The responsibility and accountability of appointing and dismissing authority
should be examined and there should
proper system of reward and punishment in acting as disciplinary authority or
Inquiry authority. There should be provision of imposing severe punishment on
Disciplinary Authority if is found that and action taken was vindictive or
against the spirit of law so that a visible and vindictive and unconstitutional
act of bureaucrats can be controlled. If this happens there will be many
officers who will follow the rule of the land rather than illegal and unethical
orders of politicians.